The relationship between microscopic margins of resection and the risk of local recurrence in patients with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy

Cancer ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. 1746-1751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart J. Schnitt ◽  
Anthony Abner ◽  
Rebecca Gelman ◽  
James L. Connolly ◽  
Abram Recht ◽  
...  
2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 1668-1675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine C. Park ◽  
Michihide Mitsumori ◽  
Asa Nixon ◽  
Abram Recht ◽  
James Connolly ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To examine the relationship between pathologic margin status and outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population comprised 533 patients with International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stage I or II breast cancer who had assessable margins, who received at least 60 Gy to the primary tumor bed, and who had more than 8 years of potential follow-up. Each margin was scored (according to the presence of invasive or in situ disease that touched the inked surgical margin) as one of the following: negative, close, focally positive, or extensively positive. Outcome at 8 years was calculated using crude rates of first site of failure. A polychotomous logistic regression analysis was performed. Median follow-up time was 127 months. RESULTS: At 8 years, patients with close margins and those with negative margins both had a rate of local recurrence (LR) of 7%. Patients with extensively positive margins had an LR rate of 27%, whereas patients with focally positive margins had an intermediate rate of LR of 14%. In the polychotomous logistic regression model, margin status and the use of systemic therapy were the only two variables that had significant effects on the risk ratio of LR to remaining alive and free of disease. Among the 45 patients with focally positive margins who received systemic therapy, the crude LR rate was 7% at 8 years (95% confidence interval, 1% to 20%). CONCLUSION: Pathologic margin status and the use of adjuvant systemic therapy are the most important factors associated with LR among patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-98
Author(s):  
Monica-Emilia Chirilă ◽  
Ivica Ratosa ◽  
Gustavo Nader Marta ◽  
Philip Poortmans

"More than 10 years ago, two pivotal trials, the Ontario Clinical Oncology Group trial and START B trial, firmly established that hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) of 40–42.5 Gy in 15–16 fractions over 3 weeks after breast conserving surgery or mastectomy results in similar rates of local recurrence and normal tissue effects. This led to a new standard for postoperative whole breast and chest wall RT. Further trials confirmed these findings and show that hypofractionated RT can also be applied for other indications, including regional nodal RT and for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). More recently, a so-called ultra-fractionation trial demonstrated that 26 Gy in 5 fractions over 1 week was non-inferior to 40 Gy, in 15 fractions in 3 weeks for local recurrence at 6 years and that late effects were similar between fractionation schedules being a treatment option for most patients with early breast cancer. Several countries and departments are now adopting hypofractionated schedules as a new standard for breast, chest wall or partial breast RT. In addition to the improvement in convenience and reduction in resources required, hypofractionated RT offers important benefits with respect to acute and late toxicity that can improve the quality of life of patients receiving breast RT."


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1123-1123
Author(s):  
Eileen Rakovitch ◽  
Sharon Nofech-Mozes ◽  
Steven Narod ◽  
Wedad Hanna ◽  
Refik Saskin ◽  
...  

1123 Background: Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS) is a non-invasive form of breast cancer which is often treated by breast-conserving surgery. The addition of radiotherapy to surgery has been shown to reduce the risk of local recurrence (LR), but use of radiotherapy varies. It is not known to what extent women with DCIS are at risk for recurrent cancer due to the omission of radiation therapy. We studied a large provincial cohort of women with DCIS who were treated with breast-conserving surgery for factors which predict local recurrence and estimate the impact of radiotherapy on local recurrence and long-term rates of breast preservation. Methods: All women diagnosed with DCIS in Ontario from 1994 to 2003 were identified. Treatments and outcomes were identified through administrative databases and validated by chart review. Women treated with breast-conserving surgery, alone or with radiotherapy, were included. Survival analyses were used to study local recurrence (DCIS or invasive) in relation to patient characteristics, tumour characteristics and treatment. Results: The cohort included 3975 women who were treated with breast-conserving therapy; of these, 1949 (49%) received radiation. At 10 years median follow-up, 736 developed LR(19%). LR developed in 259 of 1949 women who received radiotherapy (13%) and in 477 of 2026 women who did not (24%;p<0.001). The differences were significant for both invasive LR (7% vs. 14%; p<0.001) and DCIS recurrence (6% vs.9%; p<0.001). The 10-year cumulative rate of mastectomy was 13% for women who received radiotherapy compared to 17% for those who did not (p<0.01).We estimate that 29% (N=214) of all local recurrences diagnosed in Ontario in women treated for DCIS between 1994 and 2003 would be prevented if all patients received radiotherapy. Conclusions: The omission of radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery in women with DCIS resulted in a substantial number of local recurrences that might have been avoided and lower rates of breast preservation. Improvements in guidelines that facilitate the selection of women in whom radiotherapy can be avoided are needed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. S54
Author(s):  
D.G. Tiezzi ◽  
L. de Mattos ◽  
L.F. Orlandini ◽  
F.J. Candido Dos Reis ◽  
H.H. Carrara ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. D. Macmillan ◽  
A. D. Purushotham ◽  
W. D. George

2006 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristie Long Foley ◽  
Gretchen Kimmick ◽  
Fabian Camacho ◽  
Edward A. Levine ◽  
Rajesh Balkrishnan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document